Tweets vs Facebook status updates
I'm preempting a discussion that I'm bound to have the next time I go drinking with other geeks - Twitter vs Facebook for status updates. I prefer to use Twitter because :
- It has a "remember me" feature so that I don't have to login every time.
- The user community have created a (now supported) convention where you can respond to other tweets using @username. This makes Twitter a platform for very short, disconnected conversations via the web or ...
- mobile. You can opt to receive all or just direct tweets to your mobile.
- It transforms URLs through tinyurl.com to maintain the 140 character limit.
Which do you use and why?
Re: Tweets vs Facebook status updates
Surely the biggest difference is that Twitter is on the Internet and Facebook is on, well, an extranet.
I can't subscribe to or view your Facebook updates unless I have added you as a contact and you have agreed. Whereas anyone can see your tweets.
Meta comment, it'd be very useful to be able to read the post I am commenting on while I am commenting. :-)
Re: Tweets vs Facebook status updates
Twitter can be as unobtrusive as your IM client. I can post new stuff via IM, and get updates of all my buddies streams via IM. I still haven't figured out a way to do something like that with Facebook... until then I will continue to bug my friends to use Twitter.
Re: Tweets vs Facebook status updates
Hi Simon, have been given your name by Sue Waters. I understand you are getting your students to use twitter. This is something I would like to explore and chat to you about.
I am away on holiday for a week so would love to catch up with you when I get back. Cheers Sarah
" A week in the life of a newbie twitter" http://tinyurl.com/ytzv4w
Simon is a hands-on software architect who works within 